In re Lee

Michigan Supreme Court

In re Lee

14 N.W. 683, 49 Mich. 629, 1883 Mich. LEXIS 691

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 16, 1883

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 14 N.W. 683 (In re Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Lee, 14 N.W. 683, 49 Mich. 629, 1883 Mich. LEXIS 691 (Mich. 1883).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The affidavit charging the petitioner with being a fraudulent debtor did not, we think, contain any legal evidence of the existence in point of fact of any debt whatever.

The statement on that subject was nothing more than a recital of the claim made by the action and was not an affirmative allegation or averment that there was any such .debt as was claimed.

There was consequently no basis for the order on which ¿he petitioner is held, and he must be discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The affidavit charging the petitioner with being a fraudulent debtor did not, we think, contain any legal evidence of the existence in point of fact of any debt whatever.

The statement on that subject was nothing more than a recital of the claim made by the action and was not an affirmative allegation or averment that there was any such .debt as was claimed.

There was consequently no basis for the order on which ¿he petitioner is held, and he must be discharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 N.W. 683, 49 Mich. 629, 1883 Mich. LEXIS 691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lee-mich-1883.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack