In re Lee

14 N.W. 683, 49 Mich. 629, 1883 Mich. LEXIS 691
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 16, 1883·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The affidavit charging the petitioner with being a fraudulent debtor did not, we think, contain any legal evidence of the existence in point of fact of any debt whatever.

The statement on that subject was nothing more than a recital of the claim made by the action and was not an affirmative allegation or averment that there was any such .debt as was claimed.

There was consequently no basis for the order on which ¿he petitioner is held, and he must be discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Lee, 14 N.W. 683, 49 Mich. 629, 1883 Mich. LEXIS 691 (Mich. 1883).

14 N.W. 683 (In re Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dummer v. Nungesser
65 N.W. 564 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1895)