In re Lee

Court of Appeals of Maryland

In re Lee

165 A.3d 495, 454 Md. 714, 2017 WL 3206425, 2017 Md. LEXIS 477

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided July 28, 2017·No. Misc. Docket AG, No. 123, Sept. Term, 2016·Published

Opinion

Upon consideration of the Petition for Reinstatement to the Maryland Bar filed by Petitioner, Rolando Vincente Lee, and **715the response of Bar Counsel filed in the above entitled case, it is this 28th day of July, 2017

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Petition for Reinstatement of Rolando Vincente Lee be, and it is hereby, granted, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court shall replace the name of Rolando Vincente Lee upon the register of attorneys entitled to practice in this Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon consideration of the Petition for Reinstatement to the Maryland Bar filed by Petitioner, Rolando Vincente Lee, and **715the response of Bar Counsel filed in the above entitled case, it is this 28th day of July, 2017

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Petition for Reinstatement of Rolando Vincente Lee be, and it is hereby, granted, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court shall replace the name of Rolando Vincente Lee upon the register of attorneys entitled to practice in this Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

In re Lee, 165 A.3d 495, 454 Md. 714, 2017 WL 3206425, 2017 Md. LEXIS 477 (Md. 2017).

Pincite

165 A.3d 495 (In re Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.