In re Lee G.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Lee G.

46 A.D.2d 910, 363 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3240

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1974

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 46 A.D.2d 910 (In re Lee G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Lee G., 46 A.D.2d 910, 363 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3240 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 7 of the Family Court Act, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, entered July 15, 1974, which, upon a prior determination that appellant was a juvenile delinquent, committed him to a New York State training school (Division for Youth, Title III). Order [911]*911reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding remitted to the Family Court for de novo proceedings. The appeal presented no questions of fact. The record does not disclose that appellant was advised of his right to remain silent at the commencement of the fact-finding hearing (Family Ct. Act, § 741) or that he was questioned by the trial court as to any of the facts alleged in the petition. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to article 7 of the Family Court Act, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, entered July 15, 1974, which, upon a prior determination that appellant was a juvenile delinquent, committed him to a New York State training school (Division for Youth, Title III). Order [911]*911reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding remitted to the Family Court for de novo proceedings. The appeal presented no questions of fact. The record does not disclose that appellant was advised of his right to remain silent at the commencement of the fact-finding hearing (Family Ct. Act, § 741) or that he was questioned by the trial court as to any of the facts alleged in the petition. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 A.D.2d 910, 363 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lee-g-nyappdiv-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack