In re Lee

California Court of Appeal

In re Lee

28 Cal. App. 806

California Court of Appeal·Decided November 4, 1915·No. Crim. No. 435·Published

Opinion

CONREY, P. J.

The petition herein sets forth that the petitioner is under arrest and in custody of the chief of police of the city of San Diego pursuant to a complaint charging him with violations of a penal ordinance of that city. The specifications in that complaint are somewhat different from those mentioned in the Matter of the Application of Lee for Writ of Habeas Corpus, (Crim. No. 434), ante, p. 719, [153 Pac. 992], wherein the decision of the court has been filed this day; but the reasons given for that decision are amply sufficient to dispose of the questions presented in this case.

The writ is discharged and the petitioner remanded to custody.

James, J., and Shaw, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CONREY, P. J.

The petition herein sets forth that the petitioner is under arrest and in custody of the chief of police of the city of San Diego pursuant to a complaint charging him with violations of a penal ordinance of that city. The specifications in that complaint are somewhat different from those mentioned in the Matter of the Application of Lee for Writ of Habeas Corpus, (Crim. No. 434), ante, p. 719, [153 Pac. 992], wherein the decision of the court has been filed this day; but the reasons given for that decision are amply sufficient to dispose of the questions presented in this case.

The writ is discharged and the petitioner remanded to custody.

James, J., and Shaw, J., concurred.

In re Lee, 28 Cal. App. 806 (Cal. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

28 Cal. App. 806 (In re Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related