In re Lee

764 P.2d 698, 47 Cal. 3d 471, 253 Cal. Rptr. 570, 1988 Cal. LEXIS 271
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 8, 1988
DocketNo. S007341
StatusPublished

This text of 764 P.2d 698 (In re Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Lee, 764 P.2d 698, 47 Cal. 3d 471, 253 Cal. Rptr. 570, 1988 Cal. LEXIS 271 (Cal. 1988).

Opinion

Opinion

THE COURT.

Stephen Terrill Lee, admitted to practice in 1977, pled no contest in 1984 to soliciting intimidation of a witness by force or threat (Pen. Code, § 653f, subd. (a)). In 1987, this court referred the matter to the State Bar for a hearing, report and recommendation as to whether the facts and circumstances involved moral turpitude or other misconduct warranting discipline and, if so found, the discipline to be imposed.

The State Bar’s report has now been filed. The hearing panel concluded that Lee had solicited the murder of a potential witness against him, and that his actions involved moral turpitude. The hearing panel recommended disbarment. The review department adopted the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the hearing panel with minor amendments.

This court, after reviewing the entire record and briefs, and considering all the facts and circumstances, has concluded that Lee’s conduct did involve moral turpitude, and that disbarment is the proper discipline.

It is ordered that Stephen Terrill Lee be disbarred from the practice of law in this state. It is further ordered that he comply with the requirements of rule 955, California Rules of Court, within the time periods set forth in the resolution adopted by the review department on July 21, 1988. This order is effective 30 days after the filing of this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
764 P.2d 698, 47 Cal. 3d 471, 253 Cal. Rptr. 570, 1988 Cal. LEXIS 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lee-cal-1988.