In re Lee
This text of 328 F. App'x 233 (In re Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions ai*e not binding precedent in this circuit.
Federal prisoner Paul A. Lee petitions this court for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to rule on several motions. The district court docket sheet discloses that the court denied the motions on June 9, 2009, 2009 WL 1686509. As a result, Lee’s request for relief is moot. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before us and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
328 F. App'x 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lee-ca4-2009.