In re Leblanc
This text of 940 A.2d 291 (In re Leblanc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-226, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20 — 4(f) (default by respondent), that WILFRED LeBLANC, JR., of NORTH PLAINFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1998, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating RPC 1.15(a) (negligent misappropriation of client funds), RPC 1.15(b) (failure to promptly deliver funds to a third party), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that WILFRED LeBLANC, JR., is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months, effective immediately; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent shall continue to comply with the conditions imposed by the Court in the Order filed November 2, 2006; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further
ORDERED that pursuant to Rule l:20-20(c), respondent’s failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of Rule l:20-20(b)(15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent’s petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of RPC 8.1(b) and RPC 8.4(c); and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to Rule 1:10-2; and it is further
[479]*479ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
940 A.2d 291, 193 N.J. 478, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-leblanc-nj-2008.