In re Leasing of State Lands

27 Colo. 99
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedSeptember 15, 1899
DocketNo. 4155
StatusPublished

This text of 27 Colo. 99 (In re Leasing of State Lands) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Leasing of State Lands, 27 Colo. 99 (Colo. 1899).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The opinion in which is construed section 10 of the act of April 2, 1887, referred to in this communication, is reported under the title In re State Lands, 18 Colo. 359. The object of the state board of land commissioners, in whose behalf the request was made, was to obtain a construction as to the meaning and constitutionality of that section as a guide for that body in its subsequent leases of the public lands. An examination of the opinion and of the accompanying facts shows that no question relating to prior leases, or affecting the private rights of third parties was involved or determined.

In passing it may be observed that, even under the facts then disclosed, the court, in construing an existing statute, departed from the practice adhered to in many of its previous and subsequent decisions.

Be that as it may, we are clearly of opinion that the question now submitted should not be answered. It appears from the foregoing communication that heretofore the state board has made leases of public lands for a term of years, and pending their existence has extended them for an additional period. If, therefore, in this proceeding, we should define the powers of that body under the constitution, or construe the act of 1895, we would pass upon the private rights of the lessees under such leases without giving them an opportunity to be heard.

[103]*103In withholding opinion we are observing the established practice from which, it is. true, a departure has been made, but only in an exceptional class of cases to which this does not belong. In re S. R. on Irrigation, 9 Colo. 620 ; In re S. B. No. 65, 12 Colo. 466, 469; In re Legislative Appropriations, 13 Colo. 316, 321; In re H. R. 95, 15 Colo. 602; In re Continuing Appropriations, 18 Colo. 192, 195 ; In re Penitentiary Comrs., 19 Colo. 409, 414; In re Priority of Leg. Appropriations, 19 Colo. 58, 62; In re Appointments, 21 Colo. 14; In re S. B. 196, 23 Colo. 508; In re Assessment of Property, 25 Colo. 296.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. Voight
9 Colo. 614 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1886)
In re the Constitutionality of Senate Bill No. 65
12 Colo. 466 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1889)
In re Appropriations by General Assembly
13 Colo. 316 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1889)
In re House Resolution No. 25
15 Colo. 602 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1890)
In re Continuing Appropriations
18 Colo. 192 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1893)
In re Leasing of State Lands
18 Colo. 359 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1893)
In re Priority of Legislative Appropriations
19 Colo. 58 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1893)
In re Penitentiary Commissioners
19 Colo. 409 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1894)
In re Constitutionality of Senate Bill No. 196
23 Colo. 508 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1897)
In re Assessment of Property by the State Board of Equalization
25 Colo. 296 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 Colo. 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-leasing-of-state-lands-colo-1899.