In re Lea

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In re Lea

171 A.3d 1132

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided August 24, 2017·No. No. 17-BG-751·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of Disciplinary Counsel’s report regarding petitioner’s petition for reinstatement wherein Disciplinary Counsel informs the court that Ms, Lea has demonstrated that she is fit to resume the practice of law, and it appearing that petitioner is eligible to file the petition for reinstatement, see In re Lea, 13 A.3d 770 (D.C. 2011); In re Lea, 969 A.2d 881 (D.C. 2009), it is

ORDERED that petitioner’s petition for reinstatement is granted. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Terri Y. Lea is hereby reinstated to the Bar of the District of Columbia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of Disciplinary Counsel’s report regarding petitioner’s petition for reinstatement wherein Disciplinary Counsel informs the court that Ms, Lea has demonstrated that she is fit to resume the practice of law, and it appearing that petitioner is eligible to file the petition for reinstatement, see In re Lea, 13 A.3d 770 (D.C. 2011); In re Lea, 969 A.2d 881 (D.C. 2009), it is

ORDERED that petitioner’s petition for reinstatement is granted. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Terri Y. Lea is hereby reinstated to the Bar of the District of Columbia.

In re Lea, 171 A.3d 1132 (D.C. 2017).

Pincite

171 A.3d 1132 (In re Lea) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related