In re Lazarus

241 A.D.2d 5, 669 N.Y.S.2d 373, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2348
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 9, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 241 A.D.2d 5 (In re Lazarus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Lazarus, 241 A.D.2d 5, 669 N.Y.S.2d 373, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2348 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

On October 24, 1997, the respondent pleaded guilty to the crime of grand larceny in the fourth degree, a class E felony, in violation of Penal Law § 155.30, in the County Court, Suffolk County, before the Honorable John V. Vaughn.

[6]*6Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law upon his conviction of a felony.

Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted. The respondent is disbarred, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately.

Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, Eric N. Lazarus, is disbarred, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent shall comply with this Court’s rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, Eric N. Lazarus is commanded to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Saunders v. Goord
285 A.D.2d 792 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 A.D.2d 5, 669 N.Y.S.2d 373, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lazarus-nyappdiv-1998.