In re Lazarus
This text of 242 A.D. 830 (In re Lazarus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Both counsel agree that in some unexplained manner an exhibit inadvertently came before the referee which had not been offered or marked in evidence. It further appears that the decision of the learned referee was based in large part upon the contents of this supposed exhibit. Matter referred to an official referee. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 A.D. 830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lazarus-nyappdiv-1934.