In re Lazarus
242 A.D. 830
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Lazarus. Read the opinion of the Court — 245 A.D. 657 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1934·Published
Opinion
Both counsel agree that in some unexplained manner an exhibit inadvertently came before the referee which had not been offered or marked in evidence. It further appears that the decision of the learned referee was based in large part upon the contents of this supposed exhibit. Matter referred to an official referee. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Lazarus, 242 A.D. 830 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
242 A.D. 830 (In re Lazarus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.