In re Layton
This text of 41 A.D.2d 399 (In re Layton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Respondent was admitted to practice in the First Judicial Department on March 22, 1954 and has been living in Florida since 1968.
[400]*400Three charges were brought against respondent: 1. That he neglected to prosecute a negligence action; 2. that he issued checks when no funds were in the bank; and 3. that he failed to co-operate with the Grievance Committee.
The report of the Referee, which sustained only Charge No. 2, is supported by the evidence and is confirmed, and respondent is censured.
McGfvern, J. P., Markewich, Nunez, Kupeerman and Murphy, JJ., concur.
Respondent censured.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 A.D.2d 399, 343 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-layton-nyappdiv-1973.