In re Lawrence's Estate

New York Surrogate's Court

In re Lawrence's Estate

1 N.Y.S. 213, 16 N.Y. St. Rep. 971, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1260

DecidedMay 3, 1888

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.Y.S. 213 (In re Lawrence's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Lawrence's Estate, 1 N.Y.S. 213, 16 N.Y. St. Rep. 971, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1260 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

Bansom, Sur.

Application by the general guardian of two infants for a compulsory accounting; more than 18 months have elapsed since the testator’s death, and no account has been filed. The respondent claims that the petitioners are not “parties interested in the estate,” within section 2726. The petition alleges that the petitioners are interested in the estate of deceased to the extent of one-eighth each, and are particularly interested in a fund of $50,000. A life-estate in this sum was given to the wife of testator, (the grandmother of petitioners,) and, after her death, remainder to his children, one of whom was the father of these infants. The grandmother is still living, but the father of petitioners is dead. In order to require an account to be rendered, it is not necessary that there should be a party entitled to present payment. An account may be required in order to disclose the state of the fund. Bogart v. Van Velsor, 4 Edw. Ch. 718. The infants in this proceeding are the heirs and next of kin of their late father, and are entitled, as such, to the remainder after the life-estate given by the will. Persons so situated have been held to be “interested in the estate, ” within the meaning of section 2726. Campbell v. Purdy, 5 Redf. Sur. 434; In re Wood, 5 Dem. Sur. 348, 7 N. Y. St. Rep. 721; Redf. Law & Pr. Sur. 669, 670. Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bansom, Sur.

Application by the general guardian of two infants for a compulsory accounting; more than 18 months have elapsed since the testator’s death, and no account has been filed. The respondent claims that the petitioners are not “parties interested in the estate,” within section 2726. The petition alleges that the petitioners are interested in the estate of deceased to the extent of one-eighth each, and are particularly interested in a fund of $50,000. A life-estate in this sum was given to the wife of testator, (the grandmother of petitioners,) and, after her death, remainder to his children, one of whom was the father of these infants. The grandmother is still living, but the father of petitioners is dead. In order to require an account to be rendered, it is not necessary that there should be a party entitled to present payment. An account may be required in order to disclose the state of the fund. Bogart v. Van Velsor, 4 Edw. Ch. 718. The infants in this proceeding are the heirs and next of kin of their late father, and are entitled, as such, to the remainder after the life-estate given by the will. Persons so situated have been held to be “interested in the estate, ” within the meaning of section 2726. Campbell v. Purdy, 5 Redf. Sur. 434; In re Wood, 5 Dem. Sur. 348, 7 N. Y. St. Rep. 721; Redf. Law & Pr. Sur. 669, 670. Motion granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.Y.S. 213, 16 N.Y. St. Rep. 971, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lawrences-estate-nysurct-1888.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack