In Re Lawrence

28 So. 3d 259, 2010 La. LEXIS 338, 2010 WL 669906
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 26, 2010·No. 2010-B-0028·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM. *

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent failed to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client, and failed to communicate with a client. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted, and that Leo D. Lawrence, Louisiana Bar Roll number 18686, be suspended from the practice of law in Louisiana for a period of ninety days, fully deferred.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

*

Chief Justice Kimball not participating in this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Lawrence, 28 So. 3d 259, 2010 La. LEXIS 338, 2010 WL 669906 (La. 2010).

28 So. 3d 259 (In Re Lawrence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Purvis v. Grant Parish School Board
157 So. 3d 682 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2013)
Burdine v. Robertson
69 So. 3d 510 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2011)