in Re Lawrence L. Cloud
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-18-00648-CR
In re Lawrence L. Cloud
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice
Delivered and Filed: October 3, 2018 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in which he asks this court to release him from custody and dismiss with prejudice his two underlying criminal cases. Relator is represented by trial counsel below; therefore, he is not entitled to hybrid representation. Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid representation means relator’s pro se mandamus petition will be treated as presenting nothing for this court’s review. See id.; see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
Do not publish
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018CR7275 2018CR8315, styled The State of Texas v. Lawrence L. Cloud, pending in the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ron Rangel presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Lawrence L. Cloud (in Re Lawrence L. Cloud) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.