In re Lawrence
134 F. 843, 67 C.C.A. 617, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4546
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided December 22, 1904·No. No. 105·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
This case depends upon a question of fact, which has been decided adversely to the appellant by the referee, and by the district judge in review of the referee. This court should not disturb these findings, unless they are manifestly unsupported by the evidence. So far from this being so, we are of the opinion that the evidence abundantly supports them.
Order affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Lawrence, 134 F. 843, 67 C.C.A. 617, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4546 (2d Cir. 1904).
134 F. 843 (In re Lawrence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Riddlesburg Mining Co.
122 F. Supp. 560 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1954)
In re Shapiro
110 F. Supp. 288 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1953)
Abrams v. Astor
170 F.2d 544 (Second Circuit, 1948)
In Re Musgrave
27 F. Supp. 341 (N.D. West Virginia, 1939)
In re Ross & O'Brien Iron Works, Inc.
58 F.2d 961 (Second Circuit, 1932)
In re Marcus Millinery Co.
37 F.2d 94 (Second Circuit, 1930)
In re Bradley
269 F. 784 (Second Circuit, 1920)