In re Lavergne

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Lavergne

891 A.2d 615, 186 N.J. 74, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 41

DecidedFebruary 22, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 891 A.2d 615 (In re Lavergne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Lavergne, 891 A.2d 615, 186 N.J. 74, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 41 (N.J. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 05-242, concluding that EUGENE M. LAVERGNE of ASBURY PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(d), Rule 1:21-6(a)(2) (failure to deposit into a business account all funds received for professional services), and RPC 1.16(d) (failure to return file to client upon termination of representation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that EUGENE M. LAVERGNE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual [75]*75expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 05-242, concluding that EUGENE M. LAVERGNE of ASBURY PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(d), Rule 1:21-6(a)(2) (failure to deposit into a business account all funds received for professional services), and RPC 1.16(d) (failure to return file to client upon termination of representation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that EUGENE M. LAVERGNE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual [75]*75expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

891 A.2d 615, 186 N.J. 74, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lavergne-nj-2006.