Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Laux

In re Laux

205 A.D.2d 36, 618 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9728
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 18, 1994·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The respondent was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on April 2, 1951. By petition dated June 23, 1994, the Departmental [37]*37Disciplinary Committee is seeking an order suspending respondent from the practice of law, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.16 (b) (1).

Inasmuch as respondent concedes that the order sought by the Committee is appropriate, the Committee’s motion is granted and the respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, and for an indefinite period, and until further order of this Court.

Sullivan, J. P., Kupferman, Rubin, Nardelli and Williams, JJ., concur.

Application granted and respondent is suspended from practice as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York for an indefinite period, effective immediately, and until the further order of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Laux, 205 A.D.2d 36, 618 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9728 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

205 A.D.2d 36 (In re Laux) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.