In re Laurali M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Laurali M.

248 A.D.2d 983, 670 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3038

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 248 A.D.2d 983 (In re Laurali M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Laurali M., 248 A.D.2d 983, 670 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3038 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order adjudicating Laurali M. an abused child. We reject the contention of respondent that his criminal conviction of sexual abuse in the first degree is not conclusive proof of the facts underlying the abuse petition. The allegation of sexual abuse in the petition and the sexual abuse that was the subject matter of the guilty plea arose out of the same incident. Thus, the allegation was conclusively proved by respondent’s conviction of sexual abuse in the first degree (see, Matter of Denise J., 133 AD2d 687; Matter of Princess CC., 120 AD2d 917). (Appeal from Order of Genesee County Family Court, Graney, J. — Abuse.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order adjudicating Laurali M. an abused child. We reject the contention of respondent that his criminal conviction of sexual abuse in the first degree is not conclusive proof of the facts underlying the abuse petition. The allegation of sexual abuse in the petition and the sexual abuse that was the subject matter of the guilty plea arose out of the same incident. Thus, the allegation was conclusively proved by respondent’s conviction of sexual abuse in the first degree (see, Matter of Denise J., 133 AD2d 687; Matter of Princess CC., 120 AD2d 917). (Appeal from Order of Genesee County Family Court, Graney, J. — Abuse.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D.2d 983, 670 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3038, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-laurali-m-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack