In re Laurali M.

248 A.D.2d 983, 670 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3038
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 13, 1998·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order adjudicating Laurali M. an abused child. We reject the contention of respondent that his criminal conviction of sexual abuse in the first degree is not conclusive proof of the facts underlying the abuse petition. The allegation of sexual abuse in the petition and the sexual abuse that was the subject matter of the guilty plea arose out of the same incident. Thus, the allegation was conclusively proved by respondent’s conviction of sexual abuse in the first degree (see, Matter of Denise J., 133 AD2d 687; Matter of Princess CC., 120 AD2d 917). (Appeal from Order of Genesee County Family Court, Graney, J. — Abuse.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Laurali M., 248 A.D.2d 983, 670 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3038 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

248 A.D.2d 983 (In re Laurali M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Tavianna CC.
99 A.D.3d 1132 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
In re Aaron H.
72 A.D.3d 1602 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Matter of P./R. Children
2007 NY Slip Op 50258(U) (Kings Family Court, 2007)
In re Denise GG.
254 A.D.2d 582 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)