In re Laura A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Laura A.

300 A.D.2d 48, 750 N.Y.S.2d 499, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11728

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 5, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 300 A.D.2d 48 (In re Laura A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Laura A., 300 A.D.2d 48, 750 N.Y.S.2d 499, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11728 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary Bednar, J.), entered on or about January 29, 2002, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of reckless endangerment in the second degree, and conditionally discharged her for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying appellant’s motion to dismiss the petition against her, given the extreme dangerousness of appellant’s conduct (see Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947). Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Buckley, Sullivan and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary Bednar, J.), entered on or about January 29, 2002, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of reckless endangerment in the second degree, and conditionally discharged her for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying appellant’s motion to dismiss the petition against her, given the extreme dangerousness of appellant’s conduct (see Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947). Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Buckley, Sullivan and Lerner, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

300 A.D.2d 48, 750 N.Y.S.2d 499, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-laura-a-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack