In re Lauletta

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Lauletta

155 A.3d 981, 228 N.J. 155, 2017 WL 931394, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 240

DecidedMarch 9, 2017

StatusPublished

This text of 155 A.3d 981 (In re Lauletta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Lauletta, 155 A.3d 981, 228 N.J. 155, 2017 WL 931394, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 240 (N.J. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 15-406, concluding that FRANK A. LAULETTA, III, of SEWELL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1996, should be censured for violating RPC 1.8(a)(engaging in improper business transaction with a client or improperly acquiring a possessory, security, or other pecuniary interest adverse to the client), RPC 4.1(a)(knowingly making a false statement of material fact or law to a third person, or failing to disclose a material fact to a third person when disclosure is necessary to [156]*156avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the client), and RPC 8.4(c)(conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that FRANK A. LAULETTA, III, is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 15-406, concluding that FRANK A. LAULETTA, III, of SEWELL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1996, should be censured for violating RPC 1.8(a)(engaging in improper business transaction with a client or improperly acquiring a possessory, security, or other pecuniary interest adverse to the client), RPC 4.1(a)(knowingly making a false statement of material fact or law to a third person, or failing to disclose a material fact to a third person when disclosure is necessary to [156]*156avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the client), and RPC 8.4(c)(conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that FRANK A. LAULETTA, III, is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 A.3d 981, 228 N.J. 155, 2017 WL 931394, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lauletta-nj-2017.