in Re Latoya Mayberry

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 31, 2010·No. 04-10-00200-CR·Published

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00200-CR

IN RE Latoya MAYBERRY

Original Proceeding1

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 31, 2010

PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION DENIED

On March 9, 2010, relator Latoya Mayberry filed a petition for writ of prohibition. This

court’s authority to issue writs of prohibition is limited to those necessary to enforce our jurisdiction.

See TEX . GOV ’T CODE ANN . § 22.221(a) (Vernon 2004); In re Garza, 153 S.W.3d 97, 103 (Tex.

App.—San Antonio 2004, orig. proceeding). Relator has not established the writ she seeks is

necessary to enforce this court’s jurisdiction.

In addition, relator’s petition does not meet the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure. Specifically, the petition does not include a table of contents, an index of authorities, or

a certification indicating “[t]he person filing the petition [has] certif[ied] that he or she has reviewed

1 … This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010-CR-1138, pending in the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Lori Valenzuela presiding. 04-10-00200-CR

the petition and concluded that every factual statement in the petition is supported by competent

evidence included in the appendix or record.” See TEX . R. APP . P. 52.3 (b)-(c), (j). Accordingly, the

petition is denied. TEX . R. APP . P. 52.8(a).

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Latoya Mayberry, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

in Re Latoya Mayberry (in Re Latoya Mayberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Garza
153 S.W.3d 97 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)