In re Latonia J.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Latonia J.

249 A.D.2d 546, 671 N.Y.S.2d 339, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4567

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 27, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 249 A.D.2d 546 (In re Latonia J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Latonia J., 249 A.D.2d 546, 671 N.Y.S.2d 339, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4567 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a child neglect proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the grandmother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Scancarelli, J.), entered April 1, 1996, as granted a petition for an extension of placement of the child.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

Since the appellant challenges only so much of the order as extended the child’s placement with the Westchester Department of Social Services, the appeal is academic as the period of placement has expired (see, Matter of Carlos S., 243 AD2d 569; Matter of Ricardo R., 220 AD2d 431; Matter of Greg W., 213 AD2d 414; Matter of Antoine V. B., 204 AD2d 559, 560). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Santucci, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a child neglect proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the grandmother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Scancarelli, J.), entered April 1, 1996, as granted a petition for an extension of placement of the child.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

Since the appellant challenges only so much of the order as extended the child’s placement with the Westchester Department of Social Services, the appeal is academic as the period of placement has expired (see, Matter of Carlos S., 243 AD2d 569; Matter of Ricardo R., 220 AD2d 431; Matter of Greg W., 213 AD2d 414; Matter of Antoine V. B., 204 AD2d 559, 560). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Santucci, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D.2d 546, 671 N.Y.S.2d 339, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-latonia-j-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack