in Re Latitia Adelle Johnson Barnard

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 25, 2013
Docket09-13-00149-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Latitia Adelle Johnson Barnard (in Re Latitia Adelle Johnson Barnard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Latitia Adelle Johnson Barnard, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-13-00149-CV ____________________

IN RE LATITIA ADELLE JOHNSON BARNARD

_______________________________________________________ ______________

Original Proceeding ________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In a mandamus petition, Latitia Adelle Johnson Barnard seeks to compel the

trial court to vacate temporary orders in a pending suit for modification of the

parent-child relationship. 1 See In re Derzapf, 219 S.W.3d 327, 334-35 (Tex. 2007);

In re Lemons, 47 S.W.3d 202, 203-04 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 2001, orig.

proceeding). Relator contends the trial court abused its discretion by changing the

designation of the person who has the exclusive right to designate the primary

residence of the children. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 156.006 (West Supp. 2012).

1 Relator and her former spouse, Julius Marion Barnard III, have both petitioned to modify the custody provisions of their 2008 divorce decree. The real party in interest has also petitioned to terminate relator’s parental rights. 1 Relator also seeks to compel the trial court to decline to exercise jurisdiction and

transfer the case to a Louisiana court that has denied relator’s request for a

protective order and deferred to the Texas court. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. §

152.207 (West 2008).

After reviewing the mandamus record and considering the arguments

presented in the petition and the response, we conclude relator has not shown that

she is entitled to the relief she has sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of

mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on April 10, 2013 Opinion Delivered April 25, 2013 Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Derzapf
219 S.W.3d 327 (Texas Supreme Court, 2007)
In Re Lemons
47 S.W.3d 202 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Latitia Adelle Johnson Barnard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-latitia-adelle-johnson-barnard-texapp-2013.