In Re Lasley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

In Re Lasley

1930 OK 95, 285 P. 81, 142 Okla. 86, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 64

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 25, 1930

Docket20577

StatusPublished

This text of 1930 OK 95 (In Re Lasley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Lasley, 1930 OK 95, 285 P. 81, 142 Okla. 86, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 64 (Okla. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM'.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Woods county, Okla. The plaintiff in error, L. Z. Lasley, was the plaintiff below. In due time the plaintiff served and filed his briefs in full compliance with the rules of this court, but the defendant in error has wholly failed to file any brief, pleading, or to otherwise appear in this court on the merits of the case. The condition of the record in this case is analogous to the condition set forth in the case of City Nat. Bank v. Coatney, 122 Okla. 233, 253 Pac. 481, and the rule announced therein is hereby applied in this .cause.

In this case the petition in error prays that- the judgment rendered by the trial court be reversed and that judgment be rendered in favor of the appellant and against the appellee and for such other relief as to the court may seem just. The contentions of the plaintiff in error are reasonably supported by the authorities cited in his brief, and we therefore reverse the judgment of the lower court and direct it to vacate its former judgment and enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM'.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Woods county, Okla. The plaintiff in error, L. Z. Lasley, was the plaintiff below. In due time the plaintiff served and filed his briefs in full compliance with the rules of this court, but the defendant in error has wholly failed to file any brief, pleading, or to otherwise appear in this court on the merits of the case. The condition of the record in this case is analogous to the condition set forth in the case of City Nat. Bank v. Coatney, 122 Okla. 233, 253 Pac. 481, and the rule announced therein is hereby applied in this .cause.

In this case the petition in error prays that- the judgment rendered by the trial court be reversed and that judgment be rendered in favor of the appellant and against the appellee and for such other relief as to the court may seem just. The contentions of the plaintiff in error are reasonably supported by the authorities cited in his brief, and we therefore reverse the judgment of the lower court and direct it to vacate its former judgment and enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff in error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1930 OK 95, 285 P. 81, 142 Okla. 86, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lasley-okla-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack