In re Lashay J.

280 A.D.2d 320, 720 N.Y.S.2d 469, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1345
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 8, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 280 A.D.2d 320 (In re Lashay J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Lashay J., 280 A.D.2d 320, 720 N.Y.S.2d 469, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1345 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—Orders, Family Court, Bronx County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered on or about March 18, 1998, which, to the extent appealed from, upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated respondent mother’s parental rights and transferred care and custody of the subject children to petitioners Children’s Aid Society and the Commissioner of Social Services, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record amply demonstrates that petitioner agency made diligent and repeated efforts to fulfill its obligation to assist respondent in overcoming the obstacles to the children’s return. However, while respondent complied with the recommended rehabilitative programs and took advantage of the agency’s offered services, the problems that precipitated the children’s removal were still present at the time of the neglect hearing. Although the agency appropriately determined that eliminating the risk of renewed domestic violence and sexual abuse in respondent mother’s home was of paramount importance in planning for the children’s return (see, Matter of Michael M., 172 AD2d 152), respondent failed to separate .herself from her abusive husband or otherwise effectively address these problems. This failure to plan for the return of the children constituted grounds for the court’s finding of permanent neglect (see, Matter of Nathaniel T., 67 NY2d 838; Matter of Christopher II., 222 AD2d 900, lv denied 87 NY2d 812).

A suspended judgment, based on respondent’s cooperation with the agency and efforts at self-improvement, was unwarranted since there was no evidence that respondent had a realistic and feasible plan to provide an adequate and stable home for the children (see, Matter of Latasha W., 268 AD2d 340). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Mazzarelli, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Toyie Fannie J.
77 A.D.3d 449 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
In re Jazlyn F.
50 A.D.3d 602 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
In re Adante A.
38 A.D.3d 243 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
In re Mary-Athena A.C.
19 A.D.3d 140 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
In re Shante G.
18 A.D.3d 227 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
In re Empress Addis Ababa H.
16 A.D.3d 259 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
In re Donelle Thomas M.
4 A.D.3d 137 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re Pleasant Edward G.
306 A.D.2d 409 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re Israel Zacarias G.
306 A.D.2d 106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re Joyce Marie B.
305 A.D.2d 589 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re Ja-Nathan F.
300 A.D.2d 1030 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
In re Emiel B.
288 A.D.2d 57 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 A.D.2d 320, 720 N.Y.S.2d 469, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lashay-j-nyappdiv-2001.