In re Larusso

920 A.2d 1228, 190 N.J. 335, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 580
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 11, 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-343, concluding that ANTHONY LaRUSSO of WEST CALDWELL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1969, should be censured for violating RPC 1.7(a)(2) (conflict of interest — representing a client when the representation is directly adverse to another client), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANTHONY LaRUSSO is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Larusso, 920 A.2d 1228, 190 N.J. 335, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 580 (N.J. 2007).

920 A.2d 1228 (In re Larusso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bradshaw
920 A.2d 1228 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2007)