In re Larsen

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Larsen

817 A.2d 1081

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 28, 2003·No. No. 807 Disciplinary Docket No. 3·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 28th day of February 2003, a Rule having been entered by this [1082]*1082Court on December 31, 2002, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Rolf R. Larsen to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension, upon consideration of the merits of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Rolf R. Larsen is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa. R.D.E.

Chief Justice CAPPY and Justice LAMB did not participate in consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 28th day of February 2003, a Rule having been entered by this [1082]*1082Court on December 31, 2002, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Rolf R. Larsen to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension, upon consideration of the merits of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Rolf R. Larsen is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa. R.D.E.

Chief Justice CAPPY and Justice LAMB did not participate in consideration or decision of this matter.

In re Larsen, 817 A.2d 1081 (Pa. 2003).

Pincite

817 A.2d 1081 (In re Larsen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.