In Re Larry Owen and FW Services, Inc. v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Opinion issued November 13, 2025
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
a ruling on their Motion to Compel, rendering their request for mandamus relief moot.
Because the trial court has issued a ruling on Relators’ Motion to Compel, Relators have received the relief sought and their request for mandamus relief is moot. See In re Salverson, No. 01-12-00384-CV, 2013 WL 557264, at *1-2 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 14, 2013, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (dismissing petition for writ of mandamus as moot where “there [was] no longer a justiciable controversy between the parties that would be resolved by the petition for mandamus relief”); In re Jackson, No. 01-12-00020-CV, 2012 WL 405707, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 9, 2012, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (dismissing petition for writ of mandamus as moot because relator “received the relief requested in his mandamus petition”).
We thus grant Relators’ motion and dismiss their Petition for Writ of Mandamus for lack of jurisdiction. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Rivas-Molloy, Gunn, and Caughey.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Larry Owen and FW Services, Inc. v. the State of Texas (In Re Larry Owen and FW Services, Inc. v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.