In Re: Larry K. Anders v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re: Larry K. Anders v. the State of Texas (In Re: Larry K. Anders v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENIED and Opinion Filed August 31, 2023
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00782-CV
IN RE LARRY K. ANDERS, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 429th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429-05551-2018
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Carlyle, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Garcia
In his August 9, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relator seeks relief from
the trial court’s order reinstating the case following a dismissal for want of
prosecution.
Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court
clearly abused its discretion and that relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy.
In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.
proceeding). After reviewing relator’s petition and the record before us, we conclude
that relator has failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a).
/Dennise Garcia/ DENNISE GARCIA JUSTICE 230782F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Larry K. Anders v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-larry-k-anders-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.