in Re Larry Cantu, Relator

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 29, 2012·No. 04-12-00070-CR·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00070-CR

IN RE Larry M. CANTU

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 29, 2012

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

On February 2, 2012, relator Larry M. Cantu filed a petition for writ of mandamus,

complaining the trial court failed to rule on his various requests for records. However, on

October 21, 2011 relator was convicted of aggravated robbery, and no appeal was taken to this

court.

Only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over matters related to post-

conviction relief from an otherwise final felony conviction. See Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals,

802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. 1991); see also TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West Supp.

2011); Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010-CR-9404, styled State of Texas v. Larry M. Cantu, in the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Angus K. McGinty presiding. 04-12-00070-CR

S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (holding that “Article 11.07 provides the exclusive

means to challenge a final felony conviction.”). Because the relief sought in relator’s petition

relates to post-conviction relief from an otherwise final felony conviction, we are without

jurisdiction to consider his petition for writ of mandamus.

Accordingly, relator’s petition is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Larry Cantu, Relator, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

in Re Larry Cantu, Relator (in Re Larry Cantu, Relator) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals
802 S.W.2d 241 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)