in Re: Larry B. Johnson v. State
Opinion
Denied as Moot and Opinion Filed October 14, 2016
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-01074-CV No. 05-16-01075-CV No. 05-16-01076-CV No. 05-16-01077-CV
IN RE: LARRY B. JOHNSON, Relator
Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F-08-11151-H, F-08-11221-H, F-09-00661-H, and F-09-00662-H
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Myers, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Whitehill Before the Court is relator’s September 9, 2016 petition for writ of mandamus in which
relator contends the trial court failed to act on his motion for DNA testing. On September 30,
2016, the trial court issued its notification of pro se motion for post-conviction DNA testing and
appointment of counsel in accordance with article 64.02 of the Texas Code of Criminal
Procedure. Therefore, the issues presented in this petition are moot. See In re Williams, 05-12-
00485-CV, 2012 WL 1595080, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas May 7, 2012, no pet.). Accordingly, we
DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus as moot.
/Bill Whitehill/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE 161074F.P05
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: Larry B. Johnson v. State (in Re: Larry B. Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.