In re Laroque
This text of 315 F. App'x 453 (In re Laroque) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
George Paul Laroque petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his appeal from the bankruptcy court. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court denied Laroque’s motions for injunctive relief on December 22, 2008, and consolidated the four appeals Laroque has filed in order to rule on his remaining outstanding motions on December 24, 2008. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Laroque’s case, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials befdre the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
315 F. App'x 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-laroque-ca4-2009.