Home/Ohio Supreme Court/In re Larkins

In re Larkins

356 N.E.2d 298, 48 Ohio St. 2d 21, 2 Ohio Op. 3d 96, 1976 Ohio LEXIS 699
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 27, 1976
DocketNo. 76-367
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 356 N.E.2d 298 (In re Larkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Larkins, 356 N.E.2d 298, 48 Ohio St. 2d 21, 2 Ohio Op. 3d 96, 1976 Ohio LEXIS 699 (Ohio 1976).

Opinion

-Per Curiam.

• Appellant’s .amended petition for a. writ of habeas corpus seeks release on the ground of a claimed denial of due process because of the alleged inadequate representation by counsel at the time of appellant’s commitment.

There is nothing in the. record’of this habeas corpus proceeding before the Court .of Appeals to support the claims made by appellant.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals dismissing ap-r pellarit’s amended petition inr- habeas corpus is, accordingly, affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, CorrigaN, Stern, CelebRezze, AV. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Youngs v. Rogers
417 N.E.2d 1250 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1981)
Roden v. Hubbard
417 N.E.2d 1255 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1981)
In re Moore
357 N.E.2d 1082 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
356 N.E.2d 298, 48 Ohio St. 2d 21, 2 Ohio Op. 3d 96, 1976 Ohio LEXIS 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-larkins-ohio-1976.