In re Larkins

84 A.3d 262, 217 N.J. 20, 2014 WL 647293, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 39
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 14, 2014·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13-155, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule l:20-4(f) (default by respondent), that DANIEL G. LARKINS, formerly of HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with an ethics investigation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DANIEL G. LARKINS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Larkins, 84 A.3d 262, 217 N.J. 20, 2014 WL 647293, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 39 (N.J. 2014).

84 A.3d 262 (In re Larkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.