in Re Larimore Cornelius

Opinion

Opinion issued July 28, 2011.

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-11-00510-CR

———————————

In re Larimore Cornelius, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

          Relator, Larimore Cornelius, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus, requesting that we direct the trial court to provide him with a complete copy of the court reporter’s record of his trial.  Relator asserts that a bench conference conducted during voir dire is missing from the court reporter’s record, and that he is entitled to obtain a copy of the record of the bench conference for submission with his application for writ of habeas corpus.  

          We deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.  We also deny relator’s motion to appoint counsel.  See Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555, 107 S. Ct. 1990, 1993 (1987); Ex parte Graves, 70 S.W.3d 103, 110-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002).  All other outstanding motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Massengale.

Do not publish.   Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

---

[1]           Relator has identified the underlying case as State v. Cornelius, No. 388,305, in the 208th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Denise Collins presiding.