In re LaPrince B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re LaPrince B.

210 A.D.2d 963, 621 N.Y.S.2d 976

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 210 A.D.2d 963 (In re LaPrince B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re LaPrince B., 210 A.D.2d 963, 621 N.Y.S.2d 976 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Although the basis of the adjudication stated in the order is inapplicable to a neglect proceeding under article 10 of the Family Court Act, Family Court’s findings on the record are sufficient pursuant to Family Court Act § 1012 (f) (i) (A) to sustain the petition. We modify the order, therefore, by deleting from the first adjudicatory paragraph the finding that respondent failed to "plan for child” and substituting the finding that respondent failed to supply the child with adequate clothing and shelter. We further modify the order by deleting from the second adjudicatory paragraph the reference to subdivision (e) of Family Court Act § 1012 and substituting reference to subdivision (f) (i) (A). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Honan, J.—Neglect.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Although the basis of the adjudication stated in the order is inapplicable to a neglect proceeding under article 10 of the Family Court Act, Family Court’s findings on the record are sufficient pursuant to Family Court Act § 1012 (f) (i) (A) to sustain the petition. We modify the order, therefore, by deleting from the first adjudicatory paragraph the finding that respondent failed to "plan for child” and substituting the finding that respondent failed to supply the child with adequate clothing and shelter. We further modify the order by deleting from the second adjudicatory paragraph the reference to subdivision (e) of Family Court Act § 1012 and substituting reference to subdivision (f) (i) (A). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Honan, J.—Neglect.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 A.D.2d 963, 621 N.Y.S.2d 976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-laprince-b-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack