In re Lapique

California Supreme Court

In re Lapique

181 Cal. 509

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 14, 1919

DocketCrim. No. 2276

StatusPublished

This text of 181 Cal. 509 (In re Lapique) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Lapique, 181 Cal. 509 (Cal. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

[1] Any question of insufficiency of evidence to warrant an indictment is not a proper subject of inquiry on habeas corpus (In re Kennedy, 144 Cal. 634, [103 Am. St. Rep. 117, 1 Ann. Cas. 840, 67 L. R. A. 406, 78 Pac. 34]).

In so far as appears, the sufficiency of the indictment in this matter cannot be examined into on habeas corpus (In re Ruef, 150 Cal. 665, [89 Pac. 605]).

The application for a rehearing is denied.

Angellotti, C. J., Lawlor, J., Wilbur, J., and Olney, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

[1] Any question of insufficiency of evidence to warrant an indictment is not a proper subject of inquiry on habeas corpus (In re Kennedy, 144 Cal. 634, [103 Am. St. Rep. 117, 1 Ann. Cas. 840, 67 L. R. A. 406, 78 Pac. 34]).

In so far as appears, the sufficiency of the indictment in this matter cannot be examined into on habeas corpus (In re Ruef, 150 Cal. 665, [89 Pac. 605]).

The application for a rehearing is denied.

Angellotti, C. J., Lawlor, J., Wilbur, J., and Olney, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 Cal. 509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lapique-cal-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack