In re Lapique

California Supreme Court

In re Lapique

181 Cal. 509

California Supreme Court·Decided November 14, 1919·No. Crim. No. 2276·Published

Opinion

THE COURT.

[1] Any question of insufficiency of evidence to warrant an indictment is not a proper subject of inquiry on habeas corpus (In re Kennedy, 144 Cal. 634, [103 Am. St. Rep. 117, 1 Ann. Cas. 840, 67 L. R. A. 406, 78 Pac. 34]).

In so far as appears, the sufficiency of the indictment in this matter cannot be examined into on habeas corpus (In re Ruef, 150 Cal. 665, [89 Pac. 605]).

The application for a rehearing is denied.

Angellotti, C. J., Lawlor, J., Wilbur, J., and Olney, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

[1] Any question of insufficiency of evidence to warrant an indictment is not a proper subject of inquiry on habeas corpus (In re Kennedy, 144 Cal. 634, [103 Am. St. Rep. 117, 1 Ann. Cas. 840, 67 L. R. A. 406, 78 Pac. 34]).

In so far as appears, the sufficiency of the indictment in this matter cannot be examined into on habeas corpus (In re Ruef, 150 Cal. 665, [89 Pac. 605]).

The application for a rehearing is denied.

Angellotti, C. J., Lawlor, J., Wilbur, J., and Olney, J., concurred.

In re Lapique, 181 Cal. 509 (Cal. 1919).

Pincite

181 Cal. 509 (In re Lapique) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related