In re Lanita S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Lanita S.

264 A.D.2d 780, 696 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9253

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 20, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D.2d 780 (In re Lanita S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Lanita S., 264 A.D.2d 780, 696 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9253 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Hepner, J.), dated April 30, 1998, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated February 19, 1998, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of criminal trespass in the third degree, adjudged her to be a juvenile delinquent and placed her in the custody of the New York State Division for Youth for 12 months.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; Matter of Ayesha Shandeia McM., 255 AD2d 515). Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Hepner, J.), dated April 30, 1998, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated February 19, 1998, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of criminal trespass in the third degree, adjudged her to be a juvenile delinquent and placed her in the custody of the New York State Division for Youth for 12 months.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; Matter of Ayesha Shandeia McM., 255 AD2d 515). Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D.2d 780, 696 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lanita-s-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack