In Re: Lang
This text of In Re: Lang (In Re: Lang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE KEVIN W. LANG AND JAMES W. DIBBLE ______________________
2013-1639 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in Serial No. 12/856,501. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JONATHAN D. BALL, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for appellants. Of counsel was RICHARD C. PETTUS.
JOSEPH G. PICCOLO, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, and MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Associate Solicitor. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
August 13, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Lang, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lang-cafc-2014.