In Re: Lang

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedAugust 13, 2014
Docket13-1639
StatusUnpublished

This text of In Re: Lang (In Re: Lang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Lang, (Fed. Cir. 2014).

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IN RE KEVIN W. LANG AND JAMES W. DIBBLE ______________________

2013-1639 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in Serial No. 12/856,501. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JONATHAN D. BALL, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for appellants. Of counsel was RICHARD C. PETTUS.

JOSEPH G. PICCOLO, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, and MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Associate Solicitor. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 13, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Lang, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lang-cafc-2014.