In re Lane

98 A.3d 573, 219 N.J. 321
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Lane. Read the opinion of the Court — 210 N.J. 220
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 24, 2014·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13-264, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule l:20-4(f) (default by respondent), that JOSEPH C. LANE of MANASQUAN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard funds), RPC 1.15(b) (failure to promptly deliver funds to a client or third person), and RPC 1.7(a)(2) (concurrent conflict of interest);

And the Court having granted respondent’s petition for review (R-13-13), and having determined that a censure is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent’s unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOSEPH C. LANE is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

[322]*322ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Lane, 98 A.3d 573, 219 N.J. 321 (N.J. 2014).

98 A.3d 573 (In re Lane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.