In re Landsman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Landsman

127 A.D.2d 67, 513 N.Y.S.2d 404, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41343

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 26, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 127 A.D.2d 67 (In re Landsman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Landsman, 127 A.D.2d 67, 513 N.Y.S.2d 404, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41343 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Department has moved to strike respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b).

[68]*68Respondent was admitted to practice in the Second Department on October 17, 1962.

Respondent was convicted, after a jury trial, in the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lawrence Martin, J.), on October 2, 1986 of one count of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree (Penal Law § 175.35), a class E felony, and two counts of perjury in the first degree (Penal Law § 210.15), a class D felony.

A certified copy of the disposition has been presented to this court. (Judiciary Law § 90 [4] [b].) Upon his conviction, respondent ceased to be an attorney or counselor-at-law. (Judiciary Law § 90 [4] [a].)

Accordingly, the petition should be granted and respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.

Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective March 26, 1987.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI