In re Lance R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Lance R.

273 A.D.2d 78, 710 N.Y.S.2d 880, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6613

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 13, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 273 A.D.2d 78 (In re Lance R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Lance R., 273 A.D.2d 78, 710 N.Y.S.2d 880, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6613 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary Bednar, J.), entered on or about February 16, 1999, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of grand larceny in the fourth degree (two counts) and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth and fifth degrees, and placed him with New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Ellerin, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary Bednar, J.), entered on or about February 16, 1999, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of grand larceny in the fourth degree (two counts) and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth and fifth degrees, and placed him with New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Ellerin, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 A.D.2d 78, 710 N.Y.S.2d 880, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lance-r-nyappdiv-2000.