In re LaMotta

101 A.D.3d 1009, 956 N.Y.2d 177

This text of 101 A.D.3d 1009 (In re LaMotta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re LaMotta, 101 A.D.3d 1009, 956 N.Y.2d 177 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Under SCPA 1404, any party to a probate proceeding, before or after filing objections, “may examine any or all of the attesting witnesses [or] the person who prepared the will ... as to all relevant matters which may be the basis of objections to the probate of the propounded instrument” (SCPA 1404 [4]). In addition, the party conducting such examination is entitled to “all rights granted under article 31 of the civil practice law and rules with respect to document discovery” (SCPA 1404 [4]). “As a general rule, the right of potential objectants, such as adversely affected distributees or legatees, to examine under SCPA 1404, is unconditional, without any preliminary showing of the need for the examination” (Matter of Peckolick, 167 Misc 2d 597, 599 [1996]; see Matter of Baker, 160 Misc 862, 863-864 [1936]; cf. Matter of American Comm, for Weizmann Inst, of Science v Dunn, 10 NY3d 82, 94-95 [2008]). Here, Katherine Avery LaMotta, the decedent’s granddaughter, was deprived of her unconditional right to examine the attesting witnesses and person(s) who prepared the will, and to related discovery pursuant to SCPA 1404. Accordingly, the decree must be reversed, the application to conduct examinations and discovery pursuant to SCPA 1404 granted, and the matter remitted to the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County, for examinations and related discovery conducted pursuant to SCPA 1404, and a new determination of the petition. Skelos, J.P., Hall, Austin and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Committee for Weizmann Institute of Science v. Dunn
883 N.E.2d 996 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)
In re the Estate of Baker
160 Misc. 862 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1936)
In re the Estate of Peckolick
167 Misc. 2d 597 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 A.D.3d 1009, 956 N.Y.2d 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lamotta-nyappdiv-2012.