Yi-ifmir- CAUSE 1132233-C
LAMONN E. BLUNT RELATOR,
IN THEtffyU JUDICIAL DISTRICT V.
COURT IN HARRIS COUNTY TEXAS CHRIS DANIELS HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK,
RESPONDENT
APPLICATION FOR MANDANMUS
TO THE HONORABLEfflg** JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT:
NOW COMES, Lamonn E. Blunt, applicant, and asks this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to Chris Daniels, Resondent, to require the respondent to submit the said supplemental cause for review by this Court as required by statu tory law, and in support of this application the Relator would show the Court the following:
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On or about March 10, 2011, and under the above-stated cause, the relator did
file with the Respondent's office one (1) original writ of habeas corpus challeng ing his conviction, (see 1132233-A) Months later, the Relator requested this Court for Voluntary Dismissal of the Writ cause and simultaneously requested that a Supplemental writ be filed, (see EXHIBIT A) This Court granted the motion on March 26, 2014 due to late submission to this Court by the respondent, (see Clerk's Docket) Despite this Court's order, the respondent has continually failed to file the relator' supplemental writ containing additional facts and claims as mentioned in his Voluntary Dismissal motion, affecting the accuracy of the District Attorney's Answer and this Court's Conclusions on the cause. Though the relator's subsequent writ submissions under the same cause were DISMISSED for failure to "verify," his corrected submission is still being held in limbo without communications from the respondent's office. (Clerk's Docket) Despite numerous letters requesting status of the supplemental writ, and despite the relator's family hand-delivering an additional copy of the supplemental writ, the respondent has not communicated whether this Court has received its sub mission, (see Filing Date; 3/28/14)
II. JURISDICTION
This Honorable Court has exclusive jurisdiction to consider this application pursuant to Art. 4 of the TEXAS CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURES and Art. 5 of the Texas Constitution, (et.seq.)
III. ARGUMENTS and AUTHORITIES
The District Court has the power to issue a writ of mandamus against a District Court Clerk when the Clerk refuses to adopt a pleading presented for filing, to enforce the District Court's jurisdiction. (IN RE SIMMONDS 271 S.W.3d 874)
According to Art. 11.07 (et.seq.), the District Clerk must accept and file writ applications having satisfied jurisdictional prerequisites. In the instant case, the respondent has long received the relator's supplemental writ contain ing additional claims and supportive facts but is continually failing to submit the writ for review despite this court's order arid the statutory directive to do so. (see Order - Voluntary Dismissal / Art. 11.07 §§2^4 Tex.Code. Crim. Pro.)
Because this District Court has exclusive jurisdiction to hear and make recom mendations relative to the writ cause, it is deprived of its legal enforcement authority granted by Legislature and the Honorable framers of the Texas Consti tution. Additionally, due to the respondent's clear shirk from its official duties in this instance, his office has unnecessarily extended the established time by which a District court should rule on a pleading, (see TEX. RULES of JUDICIAL ADMIN. Rule 7(2) / GOV. CODE title 2, subtitle F.APP);(also ADMIN. CODE §2001.141(b)); (also Art. 11.07 et.seq.) v. CONCLUSION
The relator has no other legal remedy available to him other than this appli cation for mandamus.
This action sought is, under the facts of this case, in essence, a mere minis terial act which respondent has a legal duty to perform.
Applicant has properly requested respondent to perform which repondent has re^ fused. Without this District Court's intervention, it is feared that many more years could possibly expire before any review of the writ's merits is made and valuable witnesses and other evidence relative to the case lose its force.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, applicant prays that' this Honorable Court grant this application and that the respondent be ordered to submit the supplemental writ and memorandum for consideration by this Court. It additionally prayed that this Court examine the Clerk's docket under this cause and assure the clerk's
statutory compliance, including up-date communications with the relator as to the subsequent status of said cause.
pplicant Pro Se ftO FM 2821 Huntsville, Tx. .77349 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, LAMONN E. BLUNT, do certify that a true and correct copy of this Motion For Leave To File Mandamus and application For Mandamus has been forwarded by U.S. Mail, Postage prepaid, First Class, to the respondent (District Clerk of Harris County) on this UtU day of AuQf *2015.
NAME / ADDRESS: CHRIS DANIELS District Clerk of Harris County 105 Civil Crts. Bid. 301 Fannin St. Houston, Tx. 77002 CAUSE 1132233-C
LAMONN E. BLUNT RELATOR, IN THE 185th JUDICIAL DISTRICT
V.
COURT IN HARRIS COUNTY TEXAS CHRIS DANIELS HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK,
ORDER
ON THIS THE DAY OF 2015, came to be heard relator's Motion For Leave
and application For Mandamus, and after due consideration of the same, it is
ORDERED that this application be GRANTED / DENIED.
Judge Presdiing TO: LOUISE PEARSON CLERK OF THE TEXAS CRIMINAL COURT OF APPEALS Date: 2 /2-/|2. SUPREME COURT BUILDING 201 W. 14th St. P.O. Box 12308 Capitol Station/ Austin/ Texas 78711-2308
RE: (WRIT CAUSE NO. 1132233-A)
Dear Clerk:
Please find enclosed one (1) original and one (1) copy of my Motion To Voluntarily Dismiss Habeas Cause. It is humbly requested that a copy of the said motion be issued to the relevant parties as soon as practical. In addition/ I am asking that your honorable office keep me up-dated on the status of this motion and send me a copy of the Justice's decision in relation to this motion. If there's any questions/ please contact me at my enclosed address.
I do appreciate your office's kindest efforts in this regard.
Thank You Much, NO. 1132233-A
EX PARTE LAMONN E. BLUNT/ IN THE CRIMINAL COURT OF APPEALS
Applicant (movant) OF AUSTIN, TEXAS
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
MOTION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS HABEAS WRIT CAUSE PURSUANT TO
RULE 42.2(a). OF THE TEXAS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE (ANN.)
TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICE OF SAID COURT:
COMES NOW/ Lamonn E. Blunt/ Applicant (movant), in the above entitled and numbered cause/ and move this honorable court to dismiss said writ of
habeas corpus filed therein the convicting court/ and in support of said such motion shows:
I. JURISDICTION
This honorable court has jurisdiction pursuant to Art. 4.03 V.A.C.C.P. and the above-related Appellate Rule 42.29(a) (V.A.C.C.P.)
II. REASONS
The herein movant filed his original state habeas action pursuant to Tex.Crim.Code Proc. Art.11.07 § 3 (Vernon SUpp.2007) under the above cause. The movant acknowledges that he filed the said writ in haste and may have denied the trial court a fair opportunity to review unlisted relevant facts supportive of the claims raised. In addition, movant would like to submit additional claims and facts that would entitle him to relief. The movant assures this court that the additional claims and facts will not be excessive or redundant/ but merely wish to allow this court an oppor tunity to consider the cause in it's entirety and reach a fair opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Yi-ifmir- CAUSE 1132233-C
LAMONN E. BLUNT RELATOR,
IN THEtffyU JUDICIAL DISTRICT V.
COURT IN HARRIS COUNTY TEXAS CHRIS DANIELS HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK,
RESPONDENT
APPLICATION FOR MANDANMUS
TO THE HONORABLEfflg** JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT:
NOW COMES, Lamonn E. Blunt, applicant, and asks this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to Chris Daniels, Resondent, to require the respondent to submit the said supplemental cause for review by this Court as required by statu tory law, and in support of this application the Relator would show the Court the following:
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On or about March 10, 2011, and under the above-stated cause, the relator did
file with the Respondent's office one (1) original writ of habeas corpus challeng ing his conviction, (see 1132233-A) Months later, the Relator requested this Court for Voluntary Dismissal of the Writ cause and simultaneously requested that a Supplemental writ be filed, (see EXHIBIT A) This Court granted the motion on March 26, 2014 due to late submission to this Court by the respondent, (see Clerk's Docket) Despite this Court's order, the respondent has continually failed to file the relator' supplemental writ containing additional facts and claims as mentioned in his Voluntary Dismissal motion, affecting the accuracy of the District Attorney's Answer and this Court's Conclusions on the cause. Though the relator's subsequent writ submissions under the same cause were DISMISSED for failure to "verify," his corrected submission is still being held in limbo without communications from the respondent's office. (Clerk's Docket) Despite numerous letters requesting status of the supplemental writ, and despite the relator's family hand-delivering an additional copy of the supplemental writ, the respondent has not communicated whether this Court has received its sub mission, (see Filing Date; 3/28/14)
II. JURISDICTION
This Honorable Court has exclusive jurisdiction to consider this application pursuant to Art. 4 of the TEXAS CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURES and Art. 5 of the Texas Constitution, (et.seq.)
III. ARGUMENTS and AUTHORITIES
The District Court has the power to issue a writ of mandamus against a District Court Clerk when the Clerk refuses to adopt a pleading presented for filing, to enforce the District Court's jurisdiction. (IN RE SIMMONDS 271 S.W.3d 874)
According to Art. 11.07 (et.seq.), the District Clerk must accept and file writ applications having satisfied jurisdictional prerequisites. In the instant case, the respondent has long received the relator's supplemental writ contain ing additional claims and supportive facts but is continually failing to submit the writ for review despite this court's order arid the statutory directive to do so. (see Order - Voluntary Dismissal / Art. 11.07 §§2^4 Tex.Code. Crim. Pro.)
Because this District Court has exclusive jurisdiction to hear and make recom mendations relative to the writ cause, it is deprived of its legal enforcement authority granted by Legislature and the Honorable framers of the Texas Consti tution. Additionally, due to the respondent's clear shirk from its official duties in this instance, his office has unnecessarily extended the established time by which a District court should rule on a pleading, (see TEX. RULES of JUDICIAL ADMIN. Rule 7(2) / GOV. CODE title 2, subtitle F.APP);(also ADMIN. CODE §2001.141(b)); (also Art. 11.07 et.seq.) v. CONCLUSION
The relator has no other legal remedy available to him other than this appli cation for mandamus.
This action sought is, under the facts of this case, in essence, a mere minis terial act which respondent has a legal duty to perform.
Applicant has properly requested respondent to perform which repondent has re^ fused. Without this District Court's intervention, it is feared that many more years could possibly expire before any review of the writ's merits is made and valuable witnesses and other evidence relative to the case lose its force.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, applicant prays that' this Honorable Court grant this application and that the respondent be ordered to submit the supplemental writ and memorandum for consideration by this Court. It additionally prayed that this Court examine the Clerk's docket under this cause and assure the clerk's
statutory compliance, including up-date communications with the relator as to the subsequent status of said cause.
pplicant Pro Se ftO FM 2821 Huntsville, Tx. .77349 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, LAMONN E. BLUNT, do certify that a true and correct copy of this Motion For Leave To File Mandamus and application For Mandamus has been forwarded by U.S. Mail, Postage prepaid, First Class, to the respondent (District Clerk of Harris County) on this UtU day of AuQf *2015.
NAME / ADDRESS: CHRIS DANIELS District Clerk of Harris County 105 Civil Crts. Bid. 301 Fannin St. Houston, Tx. 77002 CAUSE 1132233-C
LAMONN E. BLUNT RELATOR, IN THE 185th JUDICIAL DISTRICT
V.
COURT IN HARRIS COUNTY TEXAS CHRIS DANIELS HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK,
ORDER
ON THIS THE DAY OF 2015, came to be heard relator's Motion For Leave
and application For Mandamus, and after due consideration of the same, it is
ORDERED that this application be GRANTED / DENIED.
Judge Presdiing TO: LOUISE PEARSON CLERK OF THE TEXAS CRIMINAL COURT OF APPEALS Date: 2 /2-/|2. SUPREME COURT BUILDING 201 W. 14th St. P.O. Box 12308 Capitol Station/ Austin/ Texas 78711-2308
RE: (WRIT CAUSE NO. 1132233-A)
Dear Clerk:
Please find enclosed one (1) original and one (1) copy of my Motion To Voluntarily Dismiss Habeas Cause. It is humbly requested that a copy of the said motion be issued to the relevant parties as soon as practical. In addition/ I am asking that your honorable office keep me up-dated on the status of this motion and send me a copy of the Justice's decision in relation to this motion. If there's any questions/ please contact me at my enclosed address.
I do appreciate your office's kindest efforts in this regard.
Thank You Much, NO. 1132233-A
EX PARTE LAMONN E. BLUNT/ IN THE CRIMINAL COURT OF APPEALS
Applicant (movant) OF AUSTIN, TEXAS
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
MOTION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS HABEAS WRIT CAUSE PURSUANT TO
RULE 42.2(a). OF THE TEXAS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE (ANN.)
TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICE OF SAID COURT:
COMES NOW/ Lamonn E. Blunt/ Applicant (movant), in the above entitled and numbered cause/ and move this honorable court to dismiss said writ of
habeas corpus filed therein the convicting court/ and in support of said such motion shows:
I. JURISDICTION
This honorable court has jurisdiction pursuant to Art. 4.03 V.A.C.C.P. and the above-related Appellate Rule 42.29(a) (V.A.C.C.P.)
II. REASONS
The herein movant filed his original state habeas action pursuant to Tex.Crim.Code Proc. Art.11.07 § 3 (Vernon SUpp.2007) under the above cause. The movant acknowledges that he filed the said writ in haste and may have denied the trial court a fair opportunity to review unlisted relevant facts supportive of the claims raised. In addition, movant would like to submit additional claims and facts that would entitle him to relief. The movant assures this court that the additional claims and facts will not be excessive or redundant/ but merely wish to allow this court an oppor tunity to consider the cause in it's entirety and reach a fair opinion.
PRAYER/CONCLUSION
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the movant prays the court grant this Motion To Voluntarily Dismiss in all fairness.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Movant, Pro Se CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, LAMONN E. BLUNT, do certify that a true and correct copy of this" Motion
To Voluntarily Dismiss, has been forwarded by the United States Mail, Postage
Prepaid, First Class, to the District Attorney, Harris County, Texas, on this "Z^vsbday of~\S-\&. * 2011.
Name / Addressrf~ye».—«?~v^, c_- ^Lv— V
DISTRICT ATTORNEY 1201 Franklin, Suite 600 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-1923
CC: JUDGE, PRESIDING COURT N0.1132233-A
EX PARTE LAMONN E. BLUNT,
Movant k
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS V.
OF AUSTIN, TEXAS
.THE STATE OF TEXAS, Respondent
On this the day of 2011, came to be heard movant's Motion To
Voluntarily Dismiss, and after due consideration of the same it is ORDERED that
this motion should be (GRANTED / DENIED).
Justice Presiding CHRI&DANIEL Harris County District Clerk
July 8, 2014
LAMONN EUGENE BLUNT ii 1529316 WYNNE UNIT 810 FM 2821 HUNTSV1LLE, TX 77349
RE: CORRESPONDEGE" LETTER OF 6/18/2014 Cause Nismber: 102233-C
Dear Applicant:
We are in-receipt of your correspondence, regarding the status of the above mentioned case. Wereceived an amended application and memorandum May 13, 2014 for case number 1132233-A. This was placed in the "A" file per your request. If it was your intention to file an Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus under Article. 11.07 for the "C" writ I have included an 11.07 application.
Pieasc refer to the Instructions sheet of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Seeking Relief From Final Felony Conviction Under Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 11.07.
Paula Gibson, Deputy Criminal PostTrial
1201 I-RANKl.iN • P.O. Uox465i • Houston. Tcxas 77210-4651 • (888) 545-5577
I'aoi: I or-I Ri;v. 01-02-04 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CLERK OF COURT P.O. Box 61010 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77208 www.txs.uscourts.gov
Lamonn Eugene Blunt 1529316 Wynne Unit 810 FM 2821 West Huntsville TX US 77349
Case: 4:1 l-cv-01471 Instruments (3 pases) ptv Date: Aor IX. 2011 Control:.i 1048696 Notice: The attached order has been entered.
If we are unable to sucessfully send this fax, we will print this notice and mail it to you. We will continue tt) attempt to fax all subsequent notices. For questions, please call (713) 250-5768. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
NOTICE THAT YOUR COMPLAINT HAS BEEN FILED
It was filed on April 8, 2011
The style of the case is
Lamonn Eugene Blunt v. Rick Thaler
The case number is 4:11-cv-01471
The District Judge assigned to your case is Judge Keith P Ellison
The nature of the claim is Habeas Corpus NOS: 530
Please write or type the civil action number on the front of all letters and documents. Please address all mail to:
United States District Clerk's Office P. O. Box 61010 Houston, Texas 77208-1010
The case will be handled in the ordinary course of the Court's work. Writing the Court to ask about your case will only SLOW the process.
Date: April 18, 2011 David J. Bradley, Clerk UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
NOTICE OF THE RIGHT TO TRY A CIVIL CASE BEFORE A MAGISTRATE JUDGE
With the consent of all the parties, a United States Magistrate Judge may preside in a civil case, including jury trial and final judgment.
The choice of trial before a magistrate judge is entirely yours. Tell only the clerk. Neither die judge or magistrate judge will be told until all the parties agree.
The district judge to whom your case is assigned must approve the referral to a magistrate judge. You may get consent forms from the clerk.
David J. Bradley, Clerk --;*;*.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Lamonn Eugene Blunt Plaintiff/Petitioner
versus § Case Number: 4:1 l-cv-01471 §• Rick Thaler Defendant/Respondent(s)
Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge
All parties to this case waive their right to proceed before a district judge and consent to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all further proceedings, including the trial and judgment. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
Order to Transfer
This case is transferred to United States Magistrate Judge
to conduct all further proceedings, including final judgment.
Date United States District Judge WRIT CAUSE 1132233-0
LAMONN E. BLUNT RELATOR, IN THE^Bg1*JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COURT IN HARRIS COUNTY TEXAS
CHRIS DANIELS •••.-, HARRIS COUNTY-DISTRICT CLERK,
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPLICATION FOR MANDAMUS
TO THE HONORABLE\R?^ JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT:
NOW COMES, Lamonn E. Blunt, applicnt, complaining of Chris Daniels, Respondent, and pursuant to the TEXAS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE moves this Court to grant this applicant leave to file this application for a writ of mandamus tendered contemporaneously with this motion.
Applicant prays that this motion be granted, the said application for mandamus be filed and set down for a hearing, that the relief requested be granted, and for other relief, general and special, including a stay of the proceedings below until the matters complained of in said application are cured.