in Re Lamonica Fox
This text of in Re Lamonica Fox (in Re Lamonica Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: In re Lamonica Fox
Appellate case number: 01-19-00155-CV
Trial court case number: 2013-55225
Trial court: 247th District Court of Harris County
Lamonica Fox has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in this Court. In connection with a petition for writ of habeas corpus, a relator must include proof of restraint. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(D). Although she claims in her petition that she is restrained of her liberty in the Harris County Jail, Fox has not provided proof that she is in custody. Absent proof of restraint in some form, Fox is not entitled to relief. See Ex parte Crawford, 506 S.W.2d 920, 921 (Tex. App.—Tyler 1974, orig. proceeding) (holding that failure to provide proof of confinement or restraint precluded issuance of writ). The Court will consider proof of custody or restraint, such as a sheriff’s certificate or other document establishing custody, if relator files this proof by 5:00 p.m. Friday, March 22, 2019. It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Peter Kelly____ Acting individually Acting for the Court
Date: __March 19, 2019___
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Lamonica Fox, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lamonica-fox-texapp-2019.