in Re: Lamarvin Gross
This text of in Re: Lamarvin Gross (in Re: Lamarvin Gross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 12-06-00432-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
§
IN RE: LAMARVIN GROSS, § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
RELATOR
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Lamarvin Gross seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the trial court to rule on his motion to represent himself in the underlying proceeding and his motion for a free “transcript and records.”
The party seeking mandamus relief has the burden to provide a record sufficient to establish his entitlement to such relief. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992). To that end, the relator in a mandamus proceeding must file along with his petition a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to his claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding. Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(j)(1)(A), 52.7(a)(1). Here, Gross did not provide copies of any documents that are material to his claim for relief. Consequently, he has failed to meet his burden to provide a record sufficient to establish his entitlement to relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
Opinion delivered February 9, 2007.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
(DO NOT PUBLISH)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Lamarvin Gross, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lamarvin-gross-texapp-2007.