In re LaLima

652 S.E.2d 397, 375 S.C. 195, 2007 S.C. LEXIS 350
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided October 17, 2007·Published

Opinion

ORDER

On April 21, 2006, petitioner was placed on interim suspension. In the Matter of LaLima, 368 S.C. 500, 629 S.E.2d 367 (2006). Petitioner has now filed a Petition for Reinstatement.

The Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

JEAN H. TOAL, C.J., JAMES E. MOORE, JOHN H. WALLER, JR., COSTA M. PLEICONES, and DONALD W. BEATTY, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re LaLima, 652 S.E.2d 397, 375 S.C. 195, 2007 S.C. LEXIS 350 (S.C. 2007).

652 S.E.2d 397 (In re LaLima) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re LaLima
629 S.E.2d 367 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2006)