In re LaLima

652 S.E.2d 397, 375 S.C. 195, 2007 S.C. LEXIS 350
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedOctober 17, 2007
StatusPublished

This text of 652 S.E.2d 397 (In re LaLima) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re LaLima, 652 S.E.2d 397, 375 S.C. 195, 2007 S.C. LEXIS 350 (S.C. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

On April 21, 2006, petitioner was placed on interim suspension. In the Matter of LaLima, 368 S.C. 500, 629 S.E.2d 367 (2006). Petitioner has now filed a Petition for Reinstatement.

The Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

JEAN H. TOAL, C.J., JAMES E. MOORE, JOHN H. WALLER, JR., COSTA M. PLEICONES, and DONALD W. BEATTY, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re LaLima
629 S.E.2d 367 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
652 S.E.2d 397, 375 S.C. 195, 2007 S.C. LEXIS 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lalima-sc-2007.