in Re Lakewood Forest Fund Inc.
This text of in Re Lakewood Forest Fund Inc. (in Re Lakewood Forest Fund Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 20, 2005.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-05-01024-CV
IN RE LAKEWOOD FOREST FUND, INC., Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On September 30, 2005, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In its petition, relator sought to have this court compel the Honorable Reece Rondon, presiding judge of the 234th District Court, to grant relator=s second amended plea in abatement, order joinder of each property owner in the subdivision, and grant its motion for leave to designate responsible third parties, all in cause number 2003-26690, styled Lakewood Forest Fund, Inc. v. Arthur R. Montemayor, Sally S. Chesser and Jess E. Chesser.
Relator has not established that it is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 20, 2005.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Yates and Anderson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Lakewood Forest Fund Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lakewood-forest-fund-inc-texapp-2005.