in Re: Lakeith Amir Sharif

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 3, 2013·No. 05-12-01640-CV·Published

Opinion

Vrit of Mandamus l)enied, Opinion issued January 3, 2013

In ‘fhe Qnizrt uf 4’VIah FiftI! Jiitrirt iii itxai tt Ji11ti . 05-12-01640-CV

IN RE LAKEITH AMIR-SHARIF, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 255th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1)C-09-7655

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices ONeill. Francis. and Murphy Opinion by Justice ONeill

Relator contends the trial court violated a ministerial duty by not properly serving him, not

ruling on his motions, and not appointing a competent attorney for him. The facts and issues are well

known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we

conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested .See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a):

Sinio,i c. Leario. 306 S.W.3d 318, 320-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (orig. proceeding); State of Tex.

e.v rel. Hill i. Court ofApjealsfr the Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924. 927 (Tex. Crirn. App. 2001) (orig.

proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

‘ MICHAELJ 0 NEILL JUSTICE 121640F.P05

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Lakeith Amir Sharif, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

in Re: Lakeith Amir Sharif (in Re: Lakeith Amir Sharif) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simon v. Levario
306 S.W.3d 318 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2009)